Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Hall of Shame Standards

NOTE: This page has been revised and updated. See new version HERE.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

SRUV received an overwhelming response to the previous HOS post. In response to suggestions we are making the following changes:

* * * * *

Any journalist who has published a Pit Bull advocacy article in a newspaper, blog, or website is eligible for the SRUV HOS. Nominees will be awarded points based on the following standards:
  1. The journalist receives one point for each term or rhetorical device from the Maul Talk Manual;
  2. The journalist receives one point for each image of a Pit Bull with infants, in affectionate poses with adults, or in a winsome pose;
  3. The journalist receives a point for each Pit Bull advocate cited; 
  4. The journalist receives a point for each citation or link from a fake science source such as the NCRC (National Canine Research Council);
  5. The journalist receives a point for each perceived expert cited or quoted.
SRUV will not attempt to score inaccuracies, distortions, or omissions.

SRUV accepts nominations from the general public. Please send a link to the article, along with any supporting links, history, or documents.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please do not cut and paste comments or include extensive linking. Comments are moderated but we will post all comments which do not include profanity or ad hominem attacks. Play nice. The SRUV comment section is not a forum for the advocacy of fighting breeds.